Posted by: in Rights Online
Technical Writing Geek points out an Ars Technica report on comments from Representative Howard Coble (R-NC), who sits on the House Subcommittee on Courts, the World wide web, and Intellectual Property. In a current editorial, Coble attempts to discourage P2P file sharing among young people, and praises Ohio University for its ban on P2P applications last year. Coble also recommends that identity theft is a great danger from file sharing. Public Knowledge is running a similar analysis, which argues against the main points from the editorial.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
diewlasing writes “Since we are living in a world where the need is growing for privacy measures and rights to use emerging technology, it seems to me that state governments should adopt a bill of rights regarding world wide web privacy, use of technology and speech on the web. For example: make it illegal to allow ISPs to release personal information to anyone who wants it. Now, obviously, that’s not the only issue. If you were asked by your state government to come up with a bill of rights for world wide web privacy, technology use, and free speech regarding the internet and emerging technologies, what would you include? Many things are covered (here in the US) under the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, but it seems to me that, these days, people with enough money can disregard this. Perhaps the states might find it a good idea to enshrine rights into law.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
Urban Strata writes “Popular mobile phone community HowardForums.com is being hit with take-down notices from MobiTV. At issue is the fact that a HowardForums community member uncovered a publicly accessible URL for MobiTV’s television stream. This URL is not encrypted or authenticated in any way, and yet MobiTV sent site owner Howard Chui a cease-and-desist letter for hosting a forum with the public URL, claiming that doing so is equivalent to hacking their service.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
palegray.net advocates a piece by Bruce Schneier up at Wired. Schneier addresses the central fallacy of the “transparent society” idea promoted by David Brin, and also takes on the flawed arguments that attempt to justify increased government monitoring of citizens. From the article: “If I disclose information to you, your power with respect to me increases. One way to address this power imbalance is for you to similarly disclose information to me. We both have less privacy, but the balance of power is maintained. But this mechanism fails utterly if you and I’ve different power levels to begin with.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
Pickens brings news that a student at Ryerson University is facing 147 counts of academic misconduct after helping to run a chemistry study group through Facebook. School officials have declined to comment, but students are claiming that it is simply a valid studying technique in the information age. Quoting: “Avenir, 18, faces an expulsion hearing Tuesday before the engineering faculty appeals committee. If he loses that appeal, he can take his case to the university’s senate. The incident has sent shock waves through student ranks, states Kim Neale, 26, the student union’s advocacy co-ordinator, who will represent Avenir at the hearing. ‘That’s the worst part; it’s creating this culture of fear, where if I post a question about physics homework on my friend’s wall (a Facebook bulletin board) and ask if anyone has any ideas how to approach this - and my prof sees this, am I cheating?’ stated Neale, who has used Facebook study groups herself.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
I Don’t Believe in Imaginary Property writes “Rep. Berman (D-CA) has removed the controversial section 104 from his PRO-IP Act. That section would have multiplied the already excessive statutory damages for infringement in the case of compilations, making the damages for infringing upon the copyrights of a single average CD rise into the millions of dollars. This change came after proponents of the amendment were unable to cite even one case where the statutory damages recovered were insufficient. But don’t let the article fool you into thinking that the PRO-IP Act is no longer controversial now that this one section is gone, the act still creates copyright cops who are authorized to seize people’s computers.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
kwietman writes “The FBI admitted that in 2006, for the fourth straight year, they improperly accessed phone and internet records of U.S. citizens. Director Robert Mueller testified that the abuses occurred prior to sweeping reforms enacted in 2007, and actually blamed the breaches in part on the telecommunications companies, who submitted more information than was requested. In another unsurprising development, the FBI also underreported the number of security letters - used to authorize wiretaps and to subpoena internet and telecom records - by over 4,600. The use of these letters to identify potential terrorists has, according to the government audit, increased dramatically since the implementation of the Patriot Act. Over 1,000 of these security letters were found to be improper in 2005, and similar numbers were expected for 2006 and 2007.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
Techdirt’s Mike Masnick is writing a series of short articles on topics around intellectual property. His latest focuses on the term itself, exploring the nomenclature people have proposed to describe matter that is neither intellectual nor property. The whole series (starting here) is well worth a read.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
circletimessquare writes “The NyTimes has an aticle describing how students and others in Cuba have taken to passing around media on memory sticks, as this is the only way they have the ability to get around state-controlled media. Also driving this phenomenon is the fact that there are so few places to get on the World wide web. In Old Havana there is only one Internet cafe; getting on the web there for an hour costs 1/3 of the average Cuban’s monthly wages. Local entrepreneurs get the memory sticks from European friends, since they’re scarce to find in Cuba through normal channels, and high-priced.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »
Posted by: in Rights Online
hey sends us to a blog at NYTimes outlining the upcoming appeal of the case known as “re Bilski,” which could spell the end of patents on methods of doing business later this year. One patent expert is quoted: “I think this is the unraveling of business method patents… I think there is a process we are going to go through to get there and the Supreme Court is going to be the one that decides it.” But another expert thinks the case is unlikely to bring down the whole class of patents: “Definitions of business method patents always end up being circular. You can’t really ban something unless you can define it and no one is offering a definition we have the ability to use.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Share This
Share This
No Comments »