CNN is reporting on the widening brouhaha that began when Barack Obama’s passport file was accessed illegally on three occasions beginning in January. Now it seems that John McCain’s file was also snooped; and that last year Hillary Clinton’s file suffered the same fate. Ars Technica nails the real importance of these breaches, saying that the Presidential hopefuls are “…currently providing the country with a very public lesson in why the ‘privacy advocates’ who oppose initiatives like Real ID and the executive branch’s domestic surveillance programs should really be called ‘democracy recommends.’ In short…, the entire incident shows exactly why citizens’ privacy is critical in a country where citizens compete with one another for control of the government.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

Wired has an article on the national fusion centers in the US, which were created to aid intelligence-sharing in the fight against terrorism but are increasingly being used to look at other sorts of crimes. The keynote of these centers is “all hazards, all threats” — the LA police chief is quoted: “Information that might seem innocuous might have some connection to terrorism.” The ACLU has up an interactive US map to help you become acquainted with your local fusion center.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

theodp writes “A newly-issued Google patent for Rendering Advertisements With Documents Having One or More Topics Using User Topic Interest describes how to detect the presence of children by ‘using evidence of sophistication determined using user actions’ and tracking their behavior using the Google Toolbar and other methods to deliver targeted ads. Which is interesting, since the Google Terms of Service supposedly prohibit the use of Services by anyone ‘not of legal age.’ The inventor is Google Principal Scientist Krishna Bharat, who is a co-inventor of another pending Google patent for inferring searchers’ ethnicity, reading level, age, sex and income (and storing it all).” Ok I’ll be the first to admit that this is greek to me. Someone smart figure this out and post a comment translating patentese into english.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

UnderAttack writes “The SANS World wide web Storm Center reports about an increasing number of sophisticated and targeted cyber attacks against Tibetan NGOs. These attacks appear to be related to attacks against other anti-chinese groups like Falun Gong. ‘There is lots of media coverage on the protests in Tibet. Something that lies under the surface, and rarely gets a blip in the press, are the various targeted cyber attacks that have been taking place against these various communities recently. These attacks are not limited to various Tibetan NGOs and support groups. They have been reported dating back to 2002, and even somewhat before that, and have affected several other communities, including Falun Gong and the Uyghurs.’”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

I Don’t Believe in Imaginary Property writes “It’s not just YouTube that’s blocked in China. After the unrest in Tibet, at least 25 video sharing sites have been shut down and others have been penalized. While the Chinese government is not admitting that violence in Tibet had anything to do with it, they do have a sudden interest in strictly enforcing licensing restrictions that require video sharing websites to register with the government. Among other things, Chinese video sharing sites must promise not to show videos that inspire fear, contain pornography, or endanger national security.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

Jeremy Martin writes “Well I suppose it’s an undeniable fact about us programmer-types — each now and then we just can’t help but get excited about something really nerdy. For me right now, that is definitely JavaScript 2.0. I was just taking a look at the proposed specifications and I am really, truly excited about what we’ve coming.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

An anonymous reader writes “The Washington Post’s Security Fix blog this day features a funny but scary interview with a guy in Seattle who owns the domain name donotreply.com. Apparently, everyone from major US banks to the Transportation Security Administration to contractors in Iraq use some variation on the address in the “From:” field of all e-mails sent out, with the result that bounced e-mails go to the owner of donotreply.com.’With the exception of extreme cases like those mentioned above, Faliszek states he long ago stopped trying to alert companies about the e-mails he was receiving. It’s just not worth it: Faliszek said he’s constantly threatened with lawsuits from companies who for one reason or another have a difficult time grasping why he’s in possession of their internal documents and e-mails.’”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This