Archive for August 2nd, 2008

Filed under: , ,

Ted Allrich is the founder of The On the internet Investor and author of the just released book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. In this weekly column, he’ll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.

Preferred stocks are much like squirrels. They don’t live on the ground. They don’t fly in the air. They’re always somewhere in between. A preferred is like that. It’s not equity in a company. It’s not debt of a company. It’s always somewhere in between.

That say of being, being in between, sometimes pays handsomely to investors. Other times, it leaves them completely isolated, with nothing to show for their investments. Here’s how preferred stocks work, and why they’re really for institutions, not individuals. Still, individuals may find them irresistible when they see some of the yields these hybrids offer.

Preferred stock usually carries a rate of payment, stated as if it were a bond. For example, General Motors (NYSE: GM) has a 6.25% preferred stock, as well as others. Most preferred stock is issued at $25 a share and pays semi-annually. That payment isn’t guaranteed. But most of the time it is cumulative, meaning that if a payment is missed, it will be made up when the company has the funds. One source of reassurance for investors when it comes to a dividend payment: the preferred stock has priority over the common shares for dividends. So common dividends will be gone before preferred stocks’ dividends are.

And those payments are dividends, not income, as from a bond. That distinction is important because institutions exempt 85% of the dividend for tax purposes. That same tax treatment isn’t granted for individuals. Furthermore most preferred stock is negotiated between the company and institutional investors, setting a payment rate that is acceptable for both sides at the time of pricing.

When companies have more than one preferred stock outstanding, each issue is designated by a Series. The first series is usually Series A, then Series B, etc. Sometimes a new series will have priority over the older ones. Most of the time, they trade on equal terms, meaning that each series will receive its dividend or none will. However, this is an important consideration when it comes to preferred stock: investors need to know if there are preferred shares with a higher ranking than the issue they’re considering. That higher ranking won’t only affect the payment schedule but also the preference in case of liquidation.

Liquidation occurs when a company goes out of business. As assets are sold, the first funds go to pay off creditors. They’ve the highest priority in the money chain. Once creditors are paid, the preferred shareholders receive the remaining distributions. If there is anything left after preferred shareholders receive their payments, then the equity holders get the rest.

Preferred shares come in two forms: straight and convertible. The straight issues receive payments and have no participation in the equity growth of the company. Convertible preferreds have a conversion factor that allows the preferred to be converted into common stock. While convertible owners wait for the conversion price to occur, they’re paid a dividend, usually smaller than a straight preferred dividend.

There are many caveats about preferred stock. The first and foremost is that it’s very, very difficult to find out much about them. They don’t trade very much, except the more massive issues which are listed on an exchange. But getting good details on any preferred issue nearly requires an investor to call the company and get specific information on it. Information such as the Call Price and when it is in effect.

The Call Price is the price at which the company can take the preferred back from investors. Companies do this when interest rates are lower, and the outstanding issue can be refinanced with a lower cost of borrowing. As a preferred holder, this is exactly what investors don’t want. Usually, the call price is at a premium to the issue price after the call price protection period is over. Call price protection is simply the length of time granted before the company can call the preferred from holders. But the premium decreases each year beyond the protection period. Eventually the company has the right to call the preferred at the issue price.

If you’ve followed the thread of this piece, you realize that preferred shareholders don’t have a lot of advantages (at least straight preferred holders). They simply receive a dividend, one that isn’t guaranteed but does have priority over common dividends. They don’t participate in any upside in the stock appreciation. To top it off, they don’t have protection against having their investment taken away (other than the initial period of protection) if rates become more attractive to the company.

That’s why individual investors need to tread carefully into the preferred markets. They are really meant for institutions. They’re extremely difficult to research. They have no voting rights attached. They have several unpleasant features that work against the investor. But they oftentimes have returns that are just too attractive to resist. That GM issue mentioned above currently yields over 12%.

Comments No Comments »

Ryan1984 writes “Only a week after the bad press coverage regarding the Linux-related bugs in a number of motherboards released by Foxconn (which turned out to be the AMI BIOS that several board makers use), Foxconn is the first vendor out with a publicly released test patch that repairs the bulk of the problems, allowing kernel 2.6.26 to run well on the afflicted boards. The remaining issues appear to either be kernel bugs in builds earlier than 2.6.26, issues with the Intel chipset itself, or minor annoyances that Foxconn is still working to resolve. Foxconn representative Heart Zhang has posted on the Ubuntu forums (where the situation began), apologizing for the issues, thanking Foxconn customers and the community at-large for their feedback, and promising that Foxconn will take Linux support and testing seriously, going forward.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Comments No Comments »

Placid notes that the EFF has announced Switzerland, a tool for testing if your ISP is interfering with your Net connection (e.g. by resetting BitTorrent transfers). It’s command-line only at this point. Of course the tool is FOSS, and you can contribute to it via its SourceForge project. From the announcement: “Developed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Switzerland is an open source software tool for testing the integrity of data communications over networks, ISPs, and firewalls. It will spot IP packets which are forged or altered between clients, inform you, and give you copies of the modified packets.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Comments No Comments »

krou sends in a Guardian (UK) article reporting that overnight speaks with the International Olympic Committee have resulted in the Chinese government lifting a ban on websites such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the BBC Chinese language service “in Beijing, Shanghai and possibly further afield.” Websites with information on the Falun Gong, Chinese dissidents, the Tibetan government in exile, and the 1989 military crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests are still inaccessible. (We’ve been discussing Chinese Olympic censorship right along.) Quoting: “A spokesman for Amnesty International said: ‘It’s good news that our site has been unblocked in Olympic venues and perhaps elsewhere in Beijing, but it is still a long way from the “complete media freedom” promised. It seems public outrage has succeeded where the IOC’s “quiet diplomacy” had failed.’ Chinese engineers quoted in an article in the Atlantic Monthly stated they’d been told to prepare to unblock access for a list of specific internet protocol addresses to used by foreign visitors. But Andrew Lih, a new media author in Beijing, said it seemed the authorities might have simply decided it was easier to lift blocks for everyone. ‘It’s possible [to block individual locations] but would be very complicated,’ he said.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Comments No Comments »

An anonymous reader brings news that the College Opportunity and Affordability Act has passed in the US Senate and now awaits only the President’s signature before becoming law. Hidden away in the lengthy bill are sections which tie college funding to “offering alternatives to illegal downloading or peer-to-peer distribution of intellectual property as well as a plan to explore technology-based deterrents to prevent such illegal activity.” The EFF issued a statement expressing concern over the bill earlier this year, shortly before the Home of Representatives approved it. We discussed the introduction of the bill last November. The Senate vote was 83-8, with 9 not voting. The full text of the bill is available. The relevant section is 494, at the end of the general provisions.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Comments No Comments »

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes “I guess the RIAA is getting nervous about the ability of its ‘national law firm’ (in charge of bringing ‘ex parte’ motions, securing default judgments, and beating up grandmothers and children) to handle the oral argument scheduled to be heard on Monday, August 4th in Duluth, in Capitol v. Thomas. So, at the eleventh hour, it has brought in one of its ‘Big Guns’ from Washington, D.C., a lawyer who argues United States Supreme Court cases like MGM v. Grokster to handle the argument. This is the case where a $222,000 verdict was awarded for downloading 24 songs, but the judge ultimately realized that he had been misled by the RIAA in issuing his jury instructions, and indicated he’s probably going to order a new trial. But, not to worry. A group of 10 copyright law professors from 10 different law schools and several other amici curiae (friends of the court) have filed briefs now, so it is highly unlikely the judge will allow himself to be misled again, no matter who the RIAA brings in as cannon fodder on Monday.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Comments No Comments »

Close
E-mail It