RomulusNR writes “Yahoo has stopped delivering This Is True, Randy Cassingham’s 14-year-old mailing list, because too many Yahoo readers have mistakenly or carelessly flagged it as spam. Yahoo readers make up over 10% of True’s readership, slashing the ad revenue that keeps it going. And Yahoo doesn’t negotiate with spammers. As Randy describes it: ‘The yahoos… ask to be put on True’s distribution, then confirm that request, and… then click the “This is Spam” button when they don’t recognize the mailing or simply don’t want it anymore. Yes, those yahoos have screwed thousands upon thousands of others who really do want my newsletter. Too bad: Yahoo is listening to the yahoos instead: they’re blocking it. To them, we’re “spammers” and no protestations from “spammers” count.’ The irony is that This is True is one of the first profitable mailing lists, predating Yahoo! Mail by almost three years.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

Ringo Kamens writes to ask if the use of Hushmail can still be considered a secure method of communication: “For a long time, Hushmail was considered a very secure email provider until an affidavit (PDF) from a DEA agent in 2007 showed that they had handed over 12 CDs of possibly decrypted data to law enforcement. Now, Cryptome has posted that the Hushmail encryption program is no longer the same program for which Hushmail releases their source. Is Hushmail even safe to use anymore?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

An anonymous reader writes “Two separate Apple security talks have been nixed at the last minute from next week’s Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas. The Washington Post’s Security Fix blog reports that Apple researcher Charles Edge was to present on flaws in Apple’s FileVault encryption plan, but asked Black Hat to cancel the speak, citing confidentiality agreements with Apple. Then on Friday, Apple pulled its security engineering team out of a planned public discussion on the company’s security practices — which would have been a first for Apple. ‘Marketing got wind of it, and nobody at Apple is ever granted to speak publicly about anything without marketing approval,’ a Black Hat spokesman said.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

Filed under: Design, Internet, Web services, Google

Google has stopped accepting new users for Google Page Creator, the company’s on the web web site creation tool. Current users can continue using Google Pages, but the company wants new users to sign up for Google Sites instead.

Google Sites is a web site/wiki creator that Google launched a year after purchasing Jotspot. Sites allows you to create editable pages, embed videos, calendars, and documents. Later this year, Google will transition all web sites made with the Google Page Creator over to Google Sites.

Google Page Creator was never as easy to use as it should have been and I honestly don’t know too many people who used it to build web pages. So I don’t anticipate many people to cry over its loss. But there is at least one potential problem. If anyone’s ever posted a link to your files at yourname.googlepages.com, that link could break later this year, because Google Sits uses a different URL structure. Hopefully Google will offer existing users the chance to transition to the new service while keeping their existing URLs.

[via Digital Inspiration]

Read

Share This

Share This

An anonymous reader writes “Israeli’s government has approved the creation of a biometric database which would contain fingerprints and facial photos of all Israeli citizens. If the bill becomes law — and it is at an early stage — the biometric information of each citizen would be embedded in their passport and national ID card. Israeli citizens would be required by law to submit to biometric testing upon request by government employees, soldiers, and policemen, so that their biometric info can be compared to the info embedded in their ID card / passport. The declared purpose of the bill is to combat forgery of passports and ID cards, and also to aid identification ‘in cases of a mass disaster.’ The bill was approved over objections from civil rights groups and the Israeli Bar. The article notes that no other democratic country has a comprehensive biometric database of all citizens.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

CWmike writes “While it might seem like a practical joke or a harmless, furtive glance, e-mail snooping could land you in more hot water than you’d ever expect — you could be charged with a federal crime. The recent case of a Philadelphia Television news anchor charged with breaking into his co-anchor’s e-mail accounts shines a light on the seriousness of such snooping. Scott Christie, a former federal prosecutor who headed up the personal hacking section at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, stated, ‘You look over someone’s shoulder and read a personal letter and that’s not a crime, so how can it be a crime to access someone’s e-mail? It’s not the same thing, of course… What you’re dong when you’re accessing e-mail is affirmatively exceeding your access to electronic documents and systems.’ He adds: ‘Usually, you’re doing that by pretending to be that person to break into their account.’” It’s worth noting that the Philadelphia man accessed his co-worker’s email over 500 times, and his use of the information he found was hardly harmless. However, the rules and conventions for email privacy are much less familiar to most people than the laws regarding snail mail. At what point does a privacy breach demand punishment?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

An anonymous reader writes “Israeli’s government has approved the creation of a biometric database which would contain fingerprints and facial photos of all Israeli citizens. If the bill becomes law — and it is at an early stage — the biometric information of each citizen would be embedded in their passport and national ID card. Israeli citizens would be required by law to submit to biometric testing upon request by government employees, soldiers, and policemen, so that their biometric info can be compared to the info embedded in their ID card / passport. The declared purpose of the bill is to combat forgery of passports and ID cards, and also to assist identification ‘in cases of a mass disaster.’ The bill was approved over objections from civil rights groups and the Israeli Bar. The article notes that no other democratic country has a comprehensive biometric database of all citizens.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

Ringo Kamens writes to ask if the use of Hushmail can still be considered a secure method of communication: “For a long time, Hushmail was considered a very secure email provider until an affidavit (PDF) from a DEA agent in 2007 showed that they had handed over 12 CDs of possibly decrypted data to law enforcement. Now, Cryptome has posted that the Hushmail encryption program is no longer the same program for which Hushmail releases their source. Is Hushmail even safe to use anymore?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

CWmike writes “While it might seem like a practical joke or a harmless, furtive glance, e-mail snooping could land you in more hot water than you’d ever anticipate — you could be charged with a federal crime. The current case of a Philadelphia Television news anchor charged with breaking into his co-anchor’s e-mail accounts shines a light on the seriousness of such snooping. Scott Christie, a former federal prosecutor who headed up the personal hacking section at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, stated, ‘You look over someone’s shoulder and read a personal letter and that’s not a crime, so how can it be a crime to access someone’s e-mail? It’s not the same thing, of course… What you’re dong when you’re accessing e-mail is affirmatively exceeding your access to electronic documents and systems.’ He adds: ‘Usually, you’re doing that by pretending to be that person to break into their account.’” It’s worth noting that the Philadelphia man accessed his co-worker’s email over 500 times, and his use of the information he found was hardly harmless. However, the rules and conventions for email privacy are much less familiar to most people than the laws regarding snail mail. At what point does a privacy breach demand punishment?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This

Ringo Kamens writes to ask if the use of Hushmail can still be considered a secure method of communication: “For a long time, Hushmail was considered a very secure email provider until an affidavit (PDF) from a DEA agent in 2007 showed that they had handed over 12 CDs of possibly decrypted data to law enforcement. Now, Cryptome has posted that the Hushmail encryption program is no longer the same program for which Hushmail releases their source. Is Hushmail even safe to use anymore?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Share This

Share This